Quote
Quote
Quote
Well, i think you're just biased.
Coz in terms of "THE most impressive ACTIVE player around", a lot of people deserve that t*tle a long time ago in different time intervals that didn't (or won't ever) get their names placed in the Hall of Fame.
I emphasized the term "active". That doesn't mean I'm biased.
If you made it "THE most impressive ACTIVE player around in 2008" or "THE most impressive ACTIVE player around in this phase of the game", then I'd take back what I said.
[ Somehow I sense that a new 'true' love story is just about to develop here
]OK, let me put this another way. If you find it normal to nominate non-existing players and to actually put them in the hall of fame, it's fine by me. I won't ask you to admit it's slightly awkward, at least for a newcomer who can't even click on their names to see thier profiles. This being said, at least have the impartiality to admit that, under these circumstances, it would only be normal to nominate somebody with the achievements of JackkDanialz, as well, let aside the 2008 thing.
Quote
If you find it normal to nominate non-existing players and to actually put them in the hall of fame, it's fine by me. I won't ask you to admit it's slightly awkward, at least for a newcomer who can't even click on their names to see thier profiles.
I have their accounts on record. I will restore them, should they wish to return
There's nothing wrong with a bit of nostalgia
Besides, I have all of their email addresses and I'll have a newsletter sent to them.
Invisible War ][
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Well, i think you're just biased.
Coz in terms of "THE most impressive ACTIVE player around", a lot of people deserve that t*tle a long time ago in different time intervals that didn't (or won't ever) get their names placed in the Hall of Fame.
I emphasized the term "active". That doesn't mean I'm biased.
If you made it "THE most impressive ACTIVE player around in 2008" or "THE most impressive ACTIVE player around in this phase of the game", then I'd take back what I said.
[ Somehow I sense that a new 'true' love story is just about to develop here
]OK, let me put this another way. If you find it normal to nominate non-existing players and to actually put them in the hall of fame, it's fine by me. I won't ask you to admit it's slightly awkward, at least for a newcomer who can't even click on their names to see thier profiles. This being said, at least have the impartiality to admit that, under these circumstances, it would only be normal to nominate somebody with the achievements of JackkDanialz, as well, let aside the 2008 thing.
( I'm starting to feel the same way.. Lolz.. )
I did admit. Read my posts.
Nomination, Yes.
Deserving to be there NOW, No.
Deserving to be there in the FUTURE, Yes.
It's not our fault they're not in the players list anymore. Cyber made an a change about a year ago or so.. to remove those names of those who went beyond the normal inactivity period. Thus having a smaller list of players, thus less prey for would-be attackers. This also preserved their current level since Cyber promised to return their accounts should they decide to play again. So I see no reason for anyone to doubt their actual existence in the game.
I didn't have to do it but I did it to say, that I didn't have to do it but I would anyway..
Edited 3 time(s). Last edited by Party Boy @ Mon Dec 15 17:46:38 EST 2008
Quote
( I'm starting to feel the same way.. Lolz.. )
I did admited. Read my posts.
Nomination, Yes.
Deserving to be there NOW, No.
Deserving to be there in the FUTURE, Yes.
Yes, indeed, you did agree with nomination. So what's the threshold? How much would somebody have to wait to get his achievements recognized?
Never mind, that would just mean keeping on the trolling.
I've made my point, I don't want to go on arguing anymore.
Quote
It's not our fault their not in the players list anymore. Cyber made an a change about a year ago or so.. to remove those names of those who went beyond the normal inactivity period. Thus having a smaller list of players, thus less prey for would-be attackers. This is also preserved their current level since Cyber promised to return their accounts should they decide to play again. So I see no reason for anyone to doubt their actual existence in the game.
I didn't say I doubt their existence. It's just that as a normal user I can't find out anything on them (except for spoken reference) since they currently have no publicly accessible profile here. So they're only known to players who've been around since their own time.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edited by Forger @ Mon Dec 15 17:49:12 EST 2008
Quote
So what's the threshold? How much would somebody have to wait to get his achievements recognized?
I'd say the exact same thing a few years back regarding the exact same people that I mentioned earlier.
So how long do you really want those "old guys" to wait?
I didn't have to do it but I did it to say, that I didn't have to do it but I would anyway..