I was not trying to provoke emotion and I realize that having criticism does sometimes hurt.  I'm not even really sure what it would mean.  I mean .1% would seem kind of small if that's the route you're going.  And, I suppose people would not have to attack in that specific place if they didn't want to.

I mean the bonus stuff, we have skills that give bonuses(embezzle) why not territory nodes?  We have gear that gives bonuses to exp and turns and credits per hour as well.

I'm not here to start an argument, but if you really don't like my ideas then that's fine.  I'm more interested in the world builder anyways.  Who knows what direction CK will choose to go anyways.  Still a lot of things to figure out, and I'm sure that he cannot satisfy everyone with whatever he does choose to include.

Jrady,

 You realize you just explicitly invoked an an emotion ("hurt") to claim you weren't using emotion to support your argument?

 In any case, you've got me wrong. I call 'em like I see 'em, but I was disappointed when you didn't give feedback sooner. For all intents and purposes, this is an argument, but as long as we keep it closer to the "debate" line, we can do some good. It may also provoke more of the people in the bleachers to provide some input.


 In any case, it doesn't look like CK is going in that direction.

For all intents & purposes Jrady, you have seemingly upset or caused hurt to Dekcah. Please be careful. The last time he tried paraphrasing me to suit his agenda it caused him hurt & scored me two weeks chat ban. just a friendly community announcement that in no way goes against any of the terms of service.

Crap. I can't believe I said "for all intensive purposes"

Oops

Hmm, "view source" doesn't seem to be working for me.