Cyberkilla

Admin

Total Posts: 5,984
Online Status: Offline
Mon Jun 28 16:43:07 EDT 2010

I think we know the perpetrator 

Invisible War ][

Sociopath

Member

Total Posts: 1,492
Online Status: Offline
Mon Jun 28 19:46:28 EDT 2010

Quote from GrammatonCleric
lol... someone likes deleting posts for no reason.

Have fun deleting this one.

Why would i delete your post? You aren't our version of a religious extremist are you? Just because a view differs from mine does not make it wrong but it is wrong when all that person does is troll.




GrammatonCleric

Member

Total Posts: 3
Online Status: Offline
Tue Jun 29 0:38:29 EDT 2010

Quote from Sociopath
Why would i delete your post? You aren't our version of a religious extremist are you? Just because a view differs from mine does not make it wrong but it is wrong when all that person does is troll.


My post doesn't need to be deleted, but it's there to make a point.

That first post that was deleted had absolutely nothing wrong with it from what I saw, definitely nothing troll-worthy. Yet it was still deleted. How does agreeing with the original poster and adding a suggestion deem a post worthy of deletion?

I didn't get to see the second post but it probably did warrant the deletion since it had to be his reaction to his post being deleted. But you see, if that first post wasn't deleted for no reason he wouldn't be making that "troll post" now would he?



Sociopath

Member

Total Posts: 1,492
Online Status: Offline
Tue Jun 29 8:10:34 EDT 2010

I also deleted CK's post but that was put back. All three posts were hidden due to their addition to an older debate about certain female pictures and I view the female emoticons as needed in the overzealous ban also so any discussion about them and exposure should be removed also.

I already commented on the presence of Mike being detrimental to anything and he will be censored as he is a cancer to the game and everything




Cyberkilla

Admin

Total Posts: 5,984
Online Status: Offline
Tue Jun 29 8:25:33 EDT 2010

I suppose I should have responded more seriously from the beginning...

It's not unreasonable to expect people to behave themselves. If you post a hundred smilies consecutively, you'll get banned from the chat room.

It would side-step the issue to remove the larger smilies entirely, but why should we? People who abuse them should just be punished.

They could have done the exact same thing with (smiley) or (smiley).

I do plan to simplify & consolidate our collection of smilies though, so it will probably be addressed soon.


Invisible War ][

Mike Niceness Old

Member

Total Posts: 0
Online Status: Offline
Tue Jun 29 14:21:29 EDT 2010


Post deleted by admin