That's my stance too. In particular, the top 5 players on the homepage looks smutty with a load of tarts on it. That's the main concern for me. Having it hidden away on some player's profile isn't as bad, but still annoying.
There are people here with good avatars, and some of them have half naked women on them - but they aren't just some slutty pic from google images with a username mspainted on top. It's nothing more than a shock tactic, as far as I'm concerned.
Now that you bring that up tho... I'm actually offended by Hero's pic. Defamation of character. Sure it could be any Mike and any Bull but common sense suggests and everyone know's who hes referring to. With that said...
If women arnt allowed then anybody with any sort of gun or weapon cannot be allowed, if we have little kids playing then we cant have things like that..if there are women with there clothes on there is no reason to why we cant have them as avatars...i can argue about almost anybodys avatar if were concerned about kids..
i don't have a problem with any of the pics, but i only post to point out something...
partyboy's pic has been a guy wearing significantly less for as long as i can remember and it has never been an issue... now when pics of women are being used it is...
that seems sexist...
they speakith the truthith.
s***ty google image rips with your name scribbled over in MSPaint is what we don't want. It looks like a thumbnail gallery of smut on the homepage.
You're making it sound like I'm being unreasonable, but it's just more spin from the usual suspects. If you have a decent avatar image, nobody cares, as long as it isn't extremely vulgar.
There is no room for debate or opinions here; what I've said is pretty clear and concise - and not particularly repressive or unreasonable at all. Quality Control.