I couldn't find where this was mentioned
This is bad... anyone who attacks inactives higher than them will lose lots of exp
and I lose to so many people 5, even 10+ levels below me because of blocks/misses/guild helpers,
it negates so much growth...
this really changes the game for me....
icky
[13:23] <CYBER> but since my lvl is low so Iwill not sell brain fish becoz I need a lots of brain
Edited 1 time(s). Last edited by Arkona @ Mon Oct 20 19:32:38 EDT 2008
Quote
I couldn't find where this was mentioned
This is bad... anyone who attacks inactives higher than them will lose lots of exp
and I lose to so many people 5, even 10+ levels below me because of blocks/misses/guild helpers,
it negates so much growth...
icky
Really? I thought it made more sense like this.
What if the lost exp was much less than what happens when you win?
EDIT:
Should attacking be a risk free environment?
Invisible War ][
Edited 1 time(s). Last edited by Cyberkilla @ Mon Oct 20 19:33:50 EDT 2008
Quote
Quote
I couldn't find where this was mentioned
This is bad... anyone who attacks inactives higher than them will lose lots of exp
and I lose to so many people 5, even 10+ levels below me because of blocks/misses/guild helpers,
it negates so much growth...
icky
Really? I thought it made more sense like this.
What if the lost exp was much less than what happens when you win?
EDIT:
Should attacking be a risk free environment?
I get losing money, but I've never played a game where you lose exp from losing an attack(edit: in fact, I've played a couple where you still gain exp); I'm in negative for the people at or below my level already...
the block stat is good enough...
[13:23] <CYBER> but since my lvl is low so Iwill not sell brain fish becoz I need a lots of brain
Edited 2 time(s). Last edited by Arkona @ Mon Oct 20 19:39:09 EDT 2008
